Diffuse sediment in Waikato waterways - sources, practices for reduction and policy options
Report: TR 2012/02
Author: H Ritchie
Abstract
This report presents information on land use practices giving rise to sediment loss to waterways. The emphasis is on diffuse sources of sediment, rather than consented activities.
Sediment loss is of concern in waterways due to:
- water quality impacts on in-stream aquatic ecosystems
- water quality impacts on human uses and values of the water
- downstream sedimentation, flow changes, and flooding which affect both people and the aquatic ecology.
There are also on-site issues when soil erosion occurs such as diminished productive capacity, infrastructure damage from slips and landscape effects.
This report reviews published information on sediment sources, and on the effectiveness, economic and practical impacts of land management practices to reduce sediment in waterways. Wider issues such as the water yield effects or social impacts
of large-scale afforestation are beyond the scope of this study.
Land use and sediment were reviewed in an earlier report on hill country resource management issues for Waikato Regional Council (Ritchie 2000). MAF has since published a comprehensive review of hill country erosion, information resources and social learning about this issue (Basher et al. 2008).
The main findings of those earlier reports relating to sediment loss are included in this current review, supplemented by
recent research.
Contents | ||
Executive summary | 3 | |
1 | Introduction | 5 |
2 | Factors determining sediment loss | 5 |
2.1 | Sediment losses under different land uses | 9 |
3 | Sediment sources within a catchment | 14 |
3.1 | Critical source areas | 19 |
4 | Practices to reduce sediment loss | 19 |
4.1 | Forest or tree cover | 19 |
4.1.1 | Economic drivers and other considerations for forest cover | 22 |
4.2 | Soil conservation plantings, gully and earthflow stabilisation | 23 |
4.2.1 | Economic drivers and other considerations for soil conservation plantings | 24 |
4.3 | Riparian management | 25 |
4.3.1 | Stock exclusion | 25 |
4.3.2 | Buffer or filter effect | 25 |
4.3.3 | Riparian planting for bank stabilisation | 27 |
4.3.4 | Economic drivers and other considerations for riparian management practices | 29 |
4.4 | Bank protection, in-stream and channel works | 32 |
4.5 | Forestry practices | 33 |
4.5.1 | Economic drivers and other considerations for forestry practices | 34 |
4.6 | Pasture, soil and grazing managment to control run-off | 34 |
4.6.1 | Economic drivers and other considerations for pasture, soil and grazing management | 35 |
4.7 | Track design and management | 37 |
4.8 | Silt traps, drains and wetlands for sediment deposition | 38 |
4.9 | Crop managment | 39 |
5 | What can be achieved through catchment-scale work? | 40 |
5.1 | Waitomo Landcare | 40 |
5.2 | Whatawhata catchment project | 40 |
5.3 | The "best dairying catchments" experience | 41 |
5.4 | Modelling for the Waikato River catchment | 42 |
6 | Policy options | 43 |
6.1 | Education and voluntary adoption | 44 |
6.2 | Financial incentives | 45 |
6.3 | Farm plans and catchment management | 46 |
6.4 | Regulation | 48 |
6.5 | Relationship of national climate change policy and regional soil conservation policy | 49 |
7 | Summary and conclusions | 50 |
7.1 | What are the main drivers of sediment loss? | 50 |
7.2 | How site-dependent are the expected gains from mitigation practices? | 51 |
7.3 | How much sediment reduction can be achieved by different mitigation practices? | 51 |
7.4 | Will riparian work make a difference? | 52 |
7.5 | Do grazing practices matter? | 52 |
7.6 | Where can education, incentives and regulation be most effective? | 53 |
7.7 | What effect will carbon trading have on farmers' decisions? | 53 |
7.8 | Is it feasible to achieve contact recreation clarity standards? | 54 |
8 | References | 56 |
To ask for help or report a problem, contact us
Tell us how we can improve the information on this page. (optional)